AI Tool Comparison
Sourcegraph Cody vs Cursor
A detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right AI tool for your workflow.
AI coding assistant with entire codebase context
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Sourcegraph Cody | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
Category | 💻 Code & Development | 💻 Code & Development |
Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
Starting Price | N/A | Free tier (2K completions), Pro $20/mo, Business $40/user/mo |
Sourcegraph Cody
Pros
- Full codebase context
- Code graph awareness
- Enterprise-ready
Cons
- Setup complexity
- Slower for small projects
Cursor
Pros
Sourcegraph Cody vs Cursor: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Sourcegraph Cody if:
- Full codebase context
- Code graph awareness
- Enterprise-ready
Choose Cursor if:
- Best AI-integrated code editor
- Codebase-aware suggestions
- Multi-file editing
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Sourcegraph Cody better than Cursor?▼
Sourcegraph Cody and Cursor serve different use cases. Sourcegraph Cody is AI coding assistant with entire codebase context while Cursor is AI-first code editor built for pair programming with AI.. The best choice depends on your specific needs and budget.
Which is cheaper: Sourcegraph Cody or Cursor?▼
Sourcegraph Cody is Freemium while Cursor is Freemium (Free tier (2K completions), Pro $20/mo, Business $40/user/mo). Compare both options to find which fits your budget.
Can I use Sourcegraph Cody and Cursor together?▼
Many teams use both Sourcegraph Cody and Cursor for different tasks. Sourcegraph Cody excels at codebase and context, while Cursor is better for code-editor and ai-coding.